Prium Awards For Individuals / Teams

Awards

Prium Awards For Individuals / Teams

The Prium Awards for Organizations is a prestigious annual event that celebrates excellence in public relations and media.

This awards program recognizes organizations that have demonstrated outstanding achievements in strategic communications, innovative media campaigns, and impactful public relations efforts.

Through a rigorous selection process, the Prium Awards highlight the most influential and creative initiatives that have successfully enhanced brand image, engaged audiences, and driven meaningful change in the industry.

Overview

The “Journalist of the Year” award recognizes outstanding journalists who have demonstrated exceptional reporting skills, ethical journalism practices, and significant contributions to the field of journalism. This prestigious award celebrates the dedication, courage, and impact of journalists in uncovering the truth and informing the public.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the “Journalist of the Year” award, candidates must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Candidates must have a minimum of five years of professional journalism experience.
Publication: Candidates must have published or broadcast their work in recognized media outlets, including newspapers, magazines, online platforms, radio, or television.
Ethical Standards: Candidates must adhere to the highest ethical standards of journalism, demonstrating integrity, fairness, and accuracy in their reporting.
Impact: Candidates’ work should have made a significant impact, contributing to public awareness, understanding, or change on important issues.
Geographical Scope: The award is open to journalists worldwide, regardless of their country of origin or residence.

Registration Requirements

To register for the “Journalist of the Year” award, candidates must provide the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, available on the award’s official website.
Resume: A detailed resume outlining the candidate’s professional experience, education, and notable achievements.
Portfolio: A portfolio of the candidate’s work, including at least five pieces of journalism published or broadcast within the last two years.
Letters of Recommendation: Two letters of recommendation from professional colleagues, editors, or mentors attesting to the candidate’s skills, integrity, and impact.
Personal Statement: A personal statement (up to 1000 words) describing the candidate’s approach to journalism, career highlights, and the impact of their work.

Evaluation Criteria

Candidates for the “Journalist of the Year” award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Quality of Work: The clarity, coherence, and quality of the candidate’s journalistic work.
Originality: The originality and innovation demonstrated in the candidate’s reporting and storytelling.
Impact: The societal impact of the candidate’s work, including any changes or actions prompted by their reporting.
Ethics: The adherence to ethical standards and the demonstration of integrity in the candidate’s work.
Professionalism: The candidate’s professionalism, including their commitment to continued growth and development in the field of journalism.
Peer Recognition: Recognition and respect from peers within the journalism community.

The evaluation process will be conducted by a panel of esteemed journalists, editors, and media experts who will review all applications and select the most deserving candidate for the award

Overview

The Best News Anchor award recognizes the outstanding achievements and contributions of a news anchor in the field of broadcast journalism. This award honors an individual who has demonstrated exceptional skill in news presentation, integrity, and professionalism, while maintaining a strong connection with their audience. The winner of this prestigious accolade will have exhibited a commitment to delivering accurate, timely, and engaging news coverage.

Eligibility Criteria

Professional Experience: The candidate must have a minimum of 5 years of experience as a news anchor.
Employment: The candidate must be currently employed by a recognized news organization.
Content: The candidate should have a proven track record of delivering high-quality news coverage, including significant stories and breaking news.
Ethics: The candidate must adhere to the highest standards of journalistic ethics and integrity.
Geographical Scope: The award is open to news anchors working in any region or country, provided they meet the other criteria.
Language: The candidate must present news in either English or the official language of the region they serve.

Registration Requirements

Nomination Form: Complete and submit the official nomination form, available on the award’s website.
Professional Resume: Provide a detailed resume outlining the candidate’s professional experience, education, and notable achievements.
Work Samples: Submit a portfolio of at least three broadcast segments or news stories anchored by the candidate, with a brief description of each piece.
Recommendation Letters: Provide at least two letters of recommendation from industry peers, supervisors, or mentors.
Statement of Ethics: Include a statement from the candidate affirming their adherence to journalistic ethics and integrity.
Photograph: A high-resolution professional headshot of the candidate.

Evaluation Criteria

Presentation Skills: Clarity, confidence, and charisma in news delivery.
Content Quality: The depth, accuracy, and relevance of the news stories presented.
Engagement: Ability to connect with the audience and maintain viewer interest.
Journalistic Integrity: Adherence to ethical standards and unbiased reporting.
Impact: The influence and reach of the news anchor’s work on the community or audience.
Innovativeness: Use of innovative techniques or approaches in news presentation.

The evaluation process will be conducted by a panel of esteemed judges from the field of journalism and media. The panel will review all submissions and select the candidate who best exemplifies the qualities of an exceptional news anchor

Overview

The Best Correspondent Award recognizes outstanding journalists who have demonstrated excellence in news reporting and storytelling. This award celebrates correspondents who have made significant contributions to journalism through their investigative skills, ethical reporting, and impactful storytelling. The award aims to honor those who have provided insightful and balanced coverage of events, thereby contributing to the public’s understanding of complex issues.

Eligibility Criteria

Professional Experience: Must be a professional journalist with a minimum of 3 years of experience in news reporting.
Type of Work: Open to correspondents working in print, broadcast, and digital media.
Geographic Scope: Correspondents working in any region or country are eligible.
Original Work: The work submitted for consideration must be original and published or broadcast within the last 12 months.
Language: Submissions can be in any language, but non-English entries must be accompanied by an English translation.

Registration Requirements

Personal Information: Full name, contact details, and professional affiliation of the correspondent.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or curriculum vitae outlining the correspondent’s professional background.
Work Samples: Up to five samples of the correspondent’s work that best represent their reporting skills and impact.
References: Contact information for two professional references who can attest to the correspondent’s qualifications and work.
Statement of Purpose: A brief statement (500 words or less) describing the correspondent’s approach to journalism and why they deserve the award.

Evaluation Criteria

Journalistic Excellence: Quality of writing/reporting, including clarity, accuracy, and depth of investigation.
Impact: The significance of the correspondent’s work in informing and influencing public opinion or policy.
Ethics: Adherence to ethical standards in journalism, including fairness, objectivity, and respect for sources.
Innovation: Use of innovative storytelling techniques or new media platforms to engage and inform audiences.
Contribution to Public Understanding: The correspondent’s role in enhancing the public’s understanding of important issues through their reporting.

This award seeks to identify and honor the best in the field, recognizing those whose work exemplifies the highest standards of journalism

Overview

The “Best Journalist” award is a prestigious accolade recognizing exceptional contributions to journalism. It honors journalists who demonstrate outstanding skills, integrity, and dedication to the field. The award aims to celebrate those who have made significant impacts through their reporting, storytelling, and investigative work, contributing to informed and engaged communities.

Eligibility Criteria

Professional Status: Open to all professional journalists, including freelance reporters, employed journalists, and journalism students.
Work Experience: Minimum of 3 years of professional experience in journalism.
Published Work: Must have published work in print, online, or broadcast media within the last year.
Ethical Standards: Demonstrates adherence to ethical journalism practices and standards.
Geographical Scope: Open to journalists working in any region or country.

Language: Submissions can be in any language, but must include an English translation if not in English

Registration Requirements

Application Form: Complete the official application form available on the award’s website.
Resume/CV: Submit a detailed resume or CV highlighting professional experience, education, and relevant achievements.
Work Samples: Provide up to five samples of published work from the past year, along with brief descriptions of each piece.
Recommendation Letters: Include at least two recommendation letters from editors, peers, or mentors familiar with the applicant’s work.
Personal Statement: Write a personal statement (500-1000 words) outlining your journalism philosophy, career goals, and reasons for applying.
Ethics Statement: Provide a statement confirming adherence to ethical journalism practices.

Evaluation Criteria

Quality of Work: Assessed on the depth, accuracy, and clarity of reporting.
Impact: The influence and effect of the journalist’s work on public opinion, policy changes, or community awareness.
Originality: Creativity and uniqueness in storytelling, investigative approach, or subject matter.
Ethics: Adherence to ethical standards in journalism, including fairness, accuracy, and integrity.
Engagement: Ability to engage and connect with the audience through compelling narratives.
Professional Development: Commitment to ongoing learning and development in the field of journalism.
Diversity and Inclusion: Efforts to cover diverse perspectives and promote inclusivity in reporting.

By recognizing and rewarding excellence in journalism, the “Best Journalist” award aims to inspire and motivate journalists to continue producing high-quality, impactful work that serves the public interest

Overview

The Best Photojournalist Award celebrates exceptional talent in photojournalism, recognizing individuals who have demonstrated excellence, innovation, and impact through their photographic work. This award aims to honor those who capture compelling stories, raise awareness about important issues, and contribute to the field of journalism through visual storytelling. The award is open to professional photojournalists from around the world who have significantly influenced the public through their photography.

Eligibility Criteria

Professional Status: Applicants must be professional photojournalists, either freelance or employed by a recognized media organization.
Experience: A minimum of 3 years of professional experience in photojournalism is required.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio containing at least 10 photographs published in recognized media outlets within the last two years.
Ethical Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and journalistic integrity, with no history of significant ethical violations.
Geographic Scope: Open to photojournalists from all countries.

Registration Requirements

Application Form: Complete the official application form available on the award’s website.
Portfolio Submission: Submit a digital portfolio of at least 10 published photographs, including captions and publication details.
Resume/CV: Provide a detailed resume or CV highlighting professional experience, awards, and significant contributions to the field.
References: Include at least two professional references who can attest to the applicant’s work and ethical standards.
Statement of Purpose: Write a brief statement (up to 500 words) explaining the significance of the submitted work and its impact on public awareness or understanding of a particular issue.

Evaluation Criteria

1. Technical Quality: Assessment of the technical excellence of the photographs, including composition, lighting, and overall visual impact.
2. Storytelling: Evaluation of the narrative strength and emotional impact of the photographs, and how effectively they convey a story.
3. Innovation: Recognition of innovative approaches and creativity in capturing and presenting the subject matter.
4. Impact: Consideration of the social, cultural, or political impact of the work, and its effectiveness in raising awareness or prompting change.
5. Ethics and Integrity: Adherence to ethical standards in photojournalism, including accuracy, fairness, and respect for subjects.

Consistency: Consistency in quality and impact across the entire portfolio submitted

Overview

The Best Radio Broadcaster Award is designed to recognize and honor outstanding radio broadcasters who have demonstrated excellence in their field. This award aims to celebrate the contributions of radio professionals who have shown exceptional talent, creativity, and dedication to their craft, providing high-quality content and engaging their audience effectively. Whether they are seasoned veterans or emerging talents, this award seeks to highlight those who have made a significant impact in the radio broadcasting industry.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Radio Broadcaster Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of two years of professional experience in radio broadcasting.
Content Quality: Nominees must consistently produce high-quality content that is informative, entertaining, and engaging.
Audience Engagement: Demonstrated ability to engage and connect with their audience, with measurable impact (e.g., listener ratings, social media engagement).
Innovation: Nominees should exhibit creativity and innovation in their approach to radio broadcasting, including use of new formats, technology, or programming ideas.
Ethical Standards: Nominees must adhere to high ethical standards and professional conduct in their broadcasting practices.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Radio Broadcaster Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, which includes personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements in radio broadcasting.
Sample Broadcasts: Submission of at least three sample broadcasts or programs that showcase the nominee’s work. These can be in audio or video format.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers or supervisors who can attest to the nominee’s talent and impact.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s contributions to the field, such as awards, certificates, or articles.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Radio Broadcaster Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Content Quality: The originality, creativity, and production quality of the submitted broadcasts.
Audience Impact: Evidence of the broadcaster’s ability to attract, retain, and engage listeners, including ratings, listener feedback, and social media presence.
Professional Growth: The nominee’s career progression, achievements, and continuous improvement in the field of radio broadcasting.
Innovation and Creativity: The extent to which the nominee has introduced innovative ideas, formats, or technologies in their broadcasts.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical broadcasting practices, including fairness, accuracy, and respect for the audience.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Radio Broadcaster Award

Overview

The Best News Editor Award is established to recognize and honor news editors who have demonstrated exceptional skill, dedication, and professionalism in their field. This award celebrates those who excel in editing news content, ensuring accuracy, clarity, and integrity in reporting. It aims to highlight the crucial role of news editors in shaping public understanding and maintaining high standards in journalism.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best News Editor Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of three years of professional experience in news editing.
Content Quality: Demonstrated ability to produce high-quality, accurate, and engaging news content.
Editorial Judgment: Proven track record of sound editorial judgment and decision-making in news coverage.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and journalistic integrity in their work.
Impact: Evidence of significant contributions to the field of news editing, such as notable stories edited or innovations in news editing processes.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best News Editor Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements in news editing.
Sample Work: Submission of at least three samples of edited news content that demonstrate the nominee’s skills and impact. These can be in text, audio, or video format.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers or supervisors who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and contributions.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or published articles.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best News Editor Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Content Quality: The clarity, accuracy, and overall quality of the edited news content.
Editorial Judgment: The nominee’s ability to make sound editorial decisions, including story selection, headline writing, and content organization.
Professional Growth: The nominee’s career progression, achievements, and continuous improvement in the field of news editing.
Impact and Influence: Evidence of the nominee’s influence on their news organization and the broader journalism community, including notable stories edited and contributions to editorial processes.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical journalism practices, including accuracy, fairness, and integrity in editing.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best News Editor Award

Overview

The Best Columnist Award is established to recognize and honor columnists who have demonstrated exceptional skill, creativity, and influence in their writing. This award celebrates those who excel in crafting insightful, engaging, and thought-provoking columns that resonate with readers. It aims to highlight the significant impact columnists have on public discourse and their contribution to journalism and literature.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Columnist Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of two years of professional experience writing columns.
Content Quality: Demonstrated ability to produce high-quality, well-researched, and engaging columns.
Audience Engagement: Proven track record of engaging and connecting with readers, with measurable impact (e.g., readership numbers, reader feedback).
Originality: Exhibit originality and creativity in their writing, presenting unique perspectives on various topics.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and journalistic integrity in their work.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Columnist Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements as a columnist.
Sample Columns: Submission of at least three sample columns that showcase the nominee’s writing style, originality, and impact. These can be in text format.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers or supervisors who can attest to the nominee’s talent and contributions.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or published articles.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Columnist Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Content Quality: The clarity, originality, and overall quality of the submitted columns.
Audience Engagement: Evidence of the columnist’s ability to attract, retain, and engage readers, including readership metrics and reader feedback.
Professional Growth: The nominee’s career progression, achievements, and continuous improvement in the field of column writing.
Impact and Influence: The extent to which the nominee’s columns have influenced public discourse, including notable topics addressed and contributions to societal debates.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical journalism practices, including accuracy, fairness, and integrity in writing.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Columnist Award

Overview

The Best Feature Writer Award is designed to recognize and honor feature writers who have demonstrated exceptional talent, creativity, and dedication in their storytelling. This award celebrates those who excel in crafting compelling, insightful, and engaging feature articles that captivate readers and offer in-depth exploration of various topics. It aims to highlight the significant contributions of feature writers to journalism and their role in enriching public understanding.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Feature Writer Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of two years of professional experience in feature writing.
Content Quality: Demonstrated ability to produce high-quality, well-researched, and engaging feature articles.
Storytelling Skills: Proven track record of excellent storytelling, with the ability to captivate and inform readers.
Originality and Creativity: Exhibit originality and creativity in their writing, presenting unique perspectives and in-depth analysis.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and journalistic integrity in their work.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Feature Writer Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements in feature writing.
Sample Articles: Submission of at least three sample feature articles that showcase the nominee’s writing style, originality, and impact. These can be in text format.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers or supervisors who can attest to the nominee’s talent and contributions.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or published articles.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Feature Writer Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Content Quality: The clarity, originality, and overall quality of the submitted feature articles.
Storytelling Skills: The nominee’s ability to craft compelling narratives that engage and inform readers.
Professional Growth: The nominee’s career progression, achievements, and continuous improvement in the field of feature writing.
Impact and Influence: The extent to which the nominee’s articles have influenced public understanding, including notable topics addressed and contributions to societal discussions.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical journalism practices, including accuracy, fairness, and integrity in writing.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Feature Writer Award

Overview

The Best Online Journalist Award recognizes and honors journalists who have demonstrated outstanding proficiency, innovation, and impact in online journalism. This award celebrates individuals who excel in delivering news and stories through digital platforms, engaging audiences effectively and contributing to the evolution of journalism in the digital age.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Online Journalist Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of three years of professional experience in online journalism.
Digital Presence: Demonstrated proficiency in utilizing digital platforms for news reporting, storytelling, and audience engagement.
Content Quality: Proven ability to produce high-quality, accurate, and engaging online journalism content.
Innovation: Exhibited innovation in digital storytelling techniques, multimedia integration, or use of interactive elements.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and journalistic integrity in online journalism practices.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Online Journalist Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements in online journalism.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing the nominee’s work in online journalism. This should include links to articles, multimedia content, or digital projects.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers or supervisors who can attest to the nominee’s talent and impact in online journalism.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or published articles.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Online Journalist Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Digital Proficiency: The effectiveness of the nominee’s use of digital platforms for news reporting and storytelling.
Content Quality: The clarity, accuracy, and overall quality of the online journalism content produced by the nominee.
Innovation and Creativity: The extent to which the nominee has introduced innovative digital storytelling techniques or formats.
Audience Engagement: Evidence of the nominee’s ability to engage and interact with online audiences, including metrics such as page views, social media shares, and audience feedback.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical journalism practices, including accuracy, fairness, and transparency in online journalism practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Online Journalist Award

Overview

The Best Blogger Award aims to recognize and honor bloggers who have demonstrated exceptional talent, creativity, and influence in the blogging sphere. This award celebrates individuals who excel in producing engaging, informative, and impactful blog content across various topics and genres, contributing significantly to online discourse and community engagement.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Blogger Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of two years of professional experience as a blogger.
Content Quality: Demonstrated ability to produce high-quality, well-written, and engaging blog posts.
Originality: Exhibit originality and creativity in their blog content, presenting unique perspectives or insights.
Audience Engagement: Proven track record of engaging and connecting with readers, demonstrated through metrics such as readership, comments, and social media interaction.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and authenticity in their blogging practices.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Blogger Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Blog Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing the nominee’s blog posts. This should include links to a selection of blog posts that highlight their writing style, expertise, and impact.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements as a blogger.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from fellow bloggers, industry peers, or followers who can attest to the nominee’s influence and impact.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or collaborations.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Blogger Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Content Quality: The clarity, originality, and overall quality of the nominee’s blog posts.
Audience Engagement: Evidence of the nominee’s ability to attract and engage a dedicated audience, including metrics such as traffic, comments, and social media interaction.
Influence: The extent to which the nominee’s blog posts have influenced discussions, trends, or opinions within their niche or community.
Consistency: Demonstrated consistency in producing valuable and insightful blog content over time.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical blogging practices, including transparency, honesty, and credibility in their content.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Blogger Award

Overview

The Best News Producer Award recognizes and honors news producers who have demonstrated exceptional skill, leadership, and innovation in producing news content. This award celebrates individuals who excel in overseeing the production of news programs, ensuring high-quality reporting, and effective storytelling. It aims to highlight the crucial role of news producers in shaping news broadcasts and delivering accurate, timely, and impactful news coverage to audiences.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best News Producer Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Experience: Nominees should have a minimum of three years of professional experience as a news producer.
Leadership Skills: Demonstrated ability to lead and manage a news production team effectively.
Content Quality: Proven track record of producing high-quality, accurate, and engaging news programs or segments.
Innovation: Exhibit innovation in news production techniques, formats, or story presentation.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and journalistic integrity in news production practices.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best News Producer Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements as a news producer.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing the nominee’s work as a news producer. This should include examples of news programs or segments produced, highlighting their role and contributions.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from industry peers, supervisors, or colleagues who can attest to the nominee’s leadership, skills, and impact.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or notable news stories produced.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best News Producer Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Leadership and Management: The nominee’s ability to lead and manage a news production team effectively.
Content Quality: The clarity, accuracy, and overall quality of the news programs or segments produced by the nominee.
Innovation and Creativity: The extent to which the nominee has introduced innovative techniques or formats in news production.
Impact: Evidence of the nominee’s contributions to delivering impactful and memorable news coverage, including notable stories produced or segments that influenced public discourse.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical journalism practices, including accuracy, fairness, and integrity in news production.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best News Producer Award

Overview

The Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award recognizes individuals who excel in managing sponsorships and partnerships for institutions. This award celebrates professionals who demonstrate exceptional skill, creativity, and effectiveness in cultivating and managing relationships with sponsors and partners. It aims to highlight the significant contributions of these individuals in securing support, funding, and strategic alliances for their institutions.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position responsible for managing sponsorships, partnerships, or fundraising activities within an institution (such as a nonprofit organization, university, museum, etc.).
Experience: Demonstrated experience in successfully securing sponsorships, partnerships, or funding for their institution.
Innovation: Exhibit creativity and innovation in developing and implementing sponsorship and partnership strategies.
Impact: Evidence of significant contributions to the institution through successful sponsorship deals, partnerships, or fundraising initiatives.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards in sponsorship and partnership practices.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s experience and achievements in sponsorship and partnership management.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing successful sponsorship deals, partnerships secured, or fundraising initiatives led by the nominee.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, or partners who can attest to the nominee’s impact and effectiveness.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, certificates, or media coverage of successful initiatives.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Effectiveness: The effectiveness and success of the nominee’s sponsorship and partnership initiatives.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in developing sponsorship and partnership strategies.
Impact: The measurable impact of the nominee’s efforts on the institution, including financial contributions, strategic alliances formed, or enhanced institutional visibility.
Leadership: The nominee’s leadership and collaboration skills in managing relationships with sponsors, partners, and internal stakeholders.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in sponsorship and partnership practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award

Overview

The PR Professional of the Year Award recognizes outstanding achievements and contributions by public relations professionals. This prestigious award celebrates individuals who have demonstrated excellence, innovation, and leadership in the field of public relations. It aims to honor professionals who have made significant impacts through effective communication strategies, crisis management, media relations, and reputation building.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the PR Professional of the Year Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work in the field of public relations or corporate communications.
Experience: Demonstrated significant professional experience in public relations, with a minimum of five years in the industry.
Achievements: Evidence of notable achievements in public relations, such as successful campaigns, crisis management, media placements, or reputation management.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership and strategic vision in shaping public relations initiatives and campaigns.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in public relations.

Registration Requirements

To register for the PR Professional of the Year Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions to public relations.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful public relations campaigns, crisis management, media relations, or other relevant achievements.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or industry peers who can attest to the nominee’s impact and excellence in public relations.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the PR Professional of the Year Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Achievements: The significance and impact of the nominee’s achievements in public relations.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in developing and executing public relations strategies and campaigns.
Leadership: The nominee’s leadership in managing teams, guiding strategies, and driving successful outcomes.
Reputation and Media Relations: Effectiveness in managing media relations, enhancing organizational reputation, and navigating crises.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in public relations practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the PR Professional of the Year Award

Overview

The Best Crisis Communicator Award recognizes individuals who have demonstrated exceptional skill, effectiveness, and leadership in managing communications during crises. This award celebrates professionals who excel in navigating challenging situations, maintaining transparency, and protecting organizational reputation through effective crisis communication strategies.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Crisis Communicator Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position in crisis communication, public relations, corporate communications, or a related field.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in managing communications during crises, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful crisis communication management, including handling high-profile crises, mitigating reputational risks, and maintaining stakeholder trust.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in crisis communication, including decision-making under pressure and guiding teams through challenging situations.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in crisis communication.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Crisis Communicator Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in crisis communication.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful crisis communication management. This should include case studies, media responses, or other relevant documents.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or industry peers who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in crisis communication.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Crisis Communicator Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Effectiveness: The effectiveness of the nominee’s crisis communication strategies in mitigating risks and protecting organizational reputation.
Leadership: The nominee’s leadership in guiding communication teams, making informed decisions, and maintaining calm during crises.
Transparency and Accountability: Demonstrated transparency and accountability in communicating with stakeholders and the public during crises.
Reputation Management: Success in preserving or enhancing organizational reputation through crisis communication efforts.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in crisis communication practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Crisis Communicator Award

Overview

The Best Media Relations Specialist Award recognizes professionals who excel in building and maintaining positive relationships with the media on behalf of organizations or individuals. This award celebrates individuals who demonstrate exceptional skills in media outreach, storytelling, and fostering strong media partnerships. It aims to highlight the crucial role of media relations specialists in enhancing organizational visibility, managing reputations, and securing positive media coverage.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Media Relations Specialist Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position in media relations, public relations, corporate communications, or a related field.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in media relations, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful media relations efforts, including securing positive media coverage, managing media inquiries, and building strong media relationships.
Innovation: Exhibit innovation in media outreach strategies, storytelling, or leveraging new media platforms.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in media relations.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Media Relations Specialist Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in media relations.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful media relations campaigns or initiatives. This should include media placements, press releases, media pitches, or other relevant documents.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or media professionals who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in media relations.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Media Relations Specialist Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Media Coverage: The success and impact of the nominee’s efforts in securing positive media coverage for their organization or clients.
Relationship Building: The strength and effectiveness of the nominee’s relationships with media professionals and outlets.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in media outreach strategies or storytelling techniques.
Reputation Management: Success in enhancing or managing organizational reputation through media relations efforts.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in media relations practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Media Relations Specialist Award

Overview

The Best Social Media Manager Award recognizes individuals who excel in managing and leveraging social media platforms to enhance brand visibility, engage audiences, and drive meaningful impact. This award celebrates professionals who demonstrate exceptional skills in social media strategy development, content creation, community management, and analytics. It aims to highlight the critical role of social media managers in building and maintaining strong online presences for organizations or individuals.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Social Media Manager Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a social media manager, digital marketer, or in a related role.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in social media management, with a minimum of three years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful social media campaigns, strategies, or initiatives that have achieved significant engagement, growth, or impact.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in content creation, storytelling, and campaign execution on social media platforms.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in social media marketing and management.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Social Media Manager Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in social media management.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful social media campaigns, content creations, or strategies implemented. This should include metrics demonstrating engagement, reach, and impact.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or colleagues who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in social media management.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, analytics reports, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Social Media Manager Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategy and Execution: The effectiveness of the nominee’s social media strategy development and campaign execution.
Engagement and Impact: The ability to generate meaningful engagement, reach target audiences, and achieve measurable impact through social media initiatives.
Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in content creation, storytelling, and use of social media platforms.
Analytics and Performance: Demonstrated ability to analyze social media metrics, optimize campaigns based on insights, and drive results.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in social media marketing and management practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Social Media Manager Award

Overview

The Best Digital PR Specialist Award recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional skills and effectiveness in leveraging digital platforms for public relations (PR) purposes. This award celebrates individuals who excel in integrating traditional PR principles with digital marketing strategies to enhance brand visibility, manage reputation, and engage audiences effectively in the digital landscape.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Digital PR Specialist Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a digital PR specialist, digital marketer specializing in PR, or in a related role.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in digital PR, with a minimum of three years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful digital PR campaigns, strategies, or initiatives that have achieved significant media coverage, audience engagement, or brand impact.
Integration: Exhibit proficiency in integrating traditional PR practices with digital marketing strategies (such as SEO, content marketing, social media, influencer marketing, etc.).
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in digital PR and communications.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Digital PR Specialist Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in digital PR.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful digital PR campaigns, media placements, or initiatives implemented. This should include metrics demonstrating impact and effectiveness.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or industry peers who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in digital PR.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, analytics reports, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Digital PR Specialist Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategy and Execution: The effectiveness of the nominee’s digital PR strategy development and campaign execution.
Media Coverage and Exposure: The ability to secure significant media coverage and exposure through digital PR efforts.
Audience Engagement: Demonstrated ability to engage and interact with target audiences effectively through digital channels.
Innovation and Creativity: The creativity demonstrated in leveraging digital platforms and technologies for PR purposes.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in digital PR practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Digital PR Specialist Award

Overview

The Best Employee Communications Leader Award honors professionals who demonstrate outstanding leadership and excellence in internal communications within organizations. This award celebrates individuals who excel in fostering employee engagement, promoting organizational culture, and effectively communicating key messages to internal stakeholders. It aims to recognize the critical role of employee communications leaders in aligning teams, boosting morale, and enhancing organizational effectiveness through strategic communication.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Employee Communications Leader Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a leadership position responsible for employee communications, internal communications, or corporate communications within an organization.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in leading internal communications initiatives, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of significant achievements in improving internal communication strategies, fostering employee engagement, and enhancing organizational culture.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in guiding communication teams, influencing organizational strategy, and driving positive change through communication.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in internal communications.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Employee Communications Leader Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in employee communications.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful internal communications initiatives, campaigns, or strategies implemented. This should include metrics demonstrating impact on employee engagement and organizational outcomes.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, or internal stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s leadership and impact in employee communications.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, employee feedback surveys, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Employee Communications Leader Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategic Vision: The development and execution of strategic internal communication plans that align with organizational goals and objectives.
Employee Engagement: The effectiveness in fostering employee engagement, morale, and a positive organizational culture through communication efforts.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in implementing new communication channels, technologies, or approaches to enhance internal communications.
Impact: The measurable impact of the nominee’s communication strategies on organizational performance, employee satisfaction, and alignment.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in internal communications practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Employee Communications Leader Award

Overview

The Best Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Advocate Award recognizes individuals who demonstrate exceptional commitment, leadership, and impact in advancing corporate social responsibility initiatives within organizations. This award celebrates professionals who actively promote ethical business practices, sustainability, community engagement, and social impact through their roles and influence.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position within an organization responsible for CSR, sustainability, corporate citizenship, or related initiatives.
Experience: Demonstrated experience and involvement in implementing CSR programs or initiatives, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of significant contributions to advancing CSR goals, such as successful CSR campaigns, partnerships, sustainability initiatives, or community projects.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in championing CSR within the organization, influencing strategy, and driving positive change.
Impact: Evidence of measurable impact on social, environmental, and economic outcomes through CSR efforts.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in CSR and corporate citizenship.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in CSR and sustainability.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful CSR initiatives, sustainability projects, community engagement efforts, or partnerships. This should include metrics demonstrating impact and outcomes.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s leadership and impact in CSR.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, CSR reports, media coverage, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Commitment and Leadership: The nominee’s commitment to CSR principles and demonstrated leadership in advancing CSR initiatives within their organization.
Impact and Effectiveness: The measurable impact of the nominee’s CSR efforts on social, environmental, and economic outcomes.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in developing and implementing CSR strategies, initiatives, or partnerships.
Stakeholder Engagement: The ability to engage and collaborate with internal and external stakeholders, including employees, communities, NGOs, and government bodies.
Ethical and Sustainable Practices: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and sustainable practices in CSR activities.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate Award

Overview

The Brand Manager Award recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional skills, creativity, and strategic vision in managing and enhancing brand identity and reputation. This award celebrates individuals who excel in developing and implementing effective brand strategies that resonate with target audiences, differentiate the brand in the marketplace, and drive business growth.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Brand Manager Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a brand manager, marketing manager, or in a related role responsible for brand strategy and management.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in brand management, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful brand management initiatives that have positively impacted brand perception, market positioning, and consumer engagement.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in developing innovative brand strategies, campaigns, or initiatives that resonate with target audiences and differentiate the brand.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in guiding cross-functional teams, collaborating with stakeholders, and driving brand success.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in brand management and marketing.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Brand Manager Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in brand management.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful brand management strategies, campaigns, or initiatives implemented. This should include metrics demonstrating impact on brand performance and consumer perception.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or industry peers who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in brand management.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, brand performance metrics, media coverage, or testimonials.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Brand Manager Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Brand Strategy: The development and implementation of effective brand strategies that align with business objectives and resonate with target audiences.
Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in developing brand campaigns, initiatives, or storytelling that differentiate the brand in the marketplace.
Impact: The measurable impact of the nominee’s brand management efforts on brand equity, market share, and consumer perception.
Leadership and Collaboration: The nominee’s leadership in guiding cross-functional teams, collaborating with stakeholders, and driving brand success.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards and integrity in brand management practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Brand Manager Award

Overview

The Best Product Launch Specialist Award recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional skill, creativity, and strategic planning in successfully launching new products or services. This award celebrates individuals who excel in managing the end-to-end process of product launches, from strategy development and market research to execution and post-launch analysis. It aims to highlight the critical role of product launch specialists in driving innovation, market entry, and business growth through effective launch strategies.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Product Launch Specialist Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a product launch specialist, marketing manager, product manager, or in a related role responsible for launching new products or services.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in planning and executing successful product launches, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful product launches that have achieved measurable business outcomes, such as market penetration, revenue growth, or customer acquisition.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in developing innovative launch strategies, campaigns, or initiatives that capture market attention and drive product adoption.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in coordinating cross-functional teams, collaborating with stakeholders, and guiding product launch efforts.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in product launch and marketing.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Product Launch Specialist Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in product launch management.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful product launches led by the nominee. This should include case studies, launch plans, metrics demonstrating impact, and any media coverage or testimonials.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, or industry peers who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in product launch management.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, product performance metrics, media coverage, or customer feedback.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Product Launch Specialist Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategy and Planning: The development and execution of a comprehensive product launch strategy that aligns with business objectives and market needs.
Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in developing launch campaigns, messaging, and promotional activities that differentiate the product in the marketplace.
Impact: The measurable impact of the nominee’s product launch efforts on business outcomes, such as market share, revenue growth, customer acquisition, or brand visibility.
Leadership and Collaboration: The nominee’s leadership in coordinating cross-functional teams, collaborating with stakeholders, and driving successful product launches.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and integrity in product launch practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Product Launch Specialist Award

Overview

The Best Event Planner Award recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional skill, creativity, and organization in planning and executing successful events. This award celebrates individuals who excel in managing all aspects of event planning, including logistics, budgeting, vendor management, and attendee experience. It aims to highlight the critical role of event planners in creating memorable and impactful experiences for clients or organizations.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Event Planner Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as an event planner, event manager, or in a related role responsible for planning and executing events.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in planning and coordinating events, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful events planned and executed, including testimonials, client feedback, or metrics demonstrating event success (e.g., attendance numbers, budget adherence).
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in event concept development, theme creation, décor, entertainment, and overall event design.
Organizational Skills: Demonstrated ability to manage multiple tasks, timelines, and budgets effectively while maintaining high standards of quality and attendee satisfaction.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in event planning and management.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Event Planner Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in event planning.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful events planned and executed by the nominee. This should include event summaries, photos, client testimonials, and any media coverage or awards received.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from clients, colleagues, or industry professionals who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in event planning.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as event budgets, vendor contracts, event timelines, or awards.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Event Planner Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Event Concept and Design: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in event concept development, theme creation, décor, and overall event design.
Execution and Logistics: The effectiveness in planning and executing all logistical aspects of events, including venue selection, vendor management, budgeting, and timeline management.
Attendee Experience: The impact of the nominee’s events on attendee satisfaction, engagement, and overall experience.
Client Satisfaction: Client feedback, testimonials, or references that demonstrate high levels of client satisfaction and successful collaboration.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and integrity in event planning practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Event Planner Award

Overview

The Best Content Creator Award recognizes individuals who demonstrate exceptional creativity, innovation, and impact in creating compelling and engaging content across various platforms. This award celebrates professionals who excel in producing high-quality content that resonates with audiences, drives engagement, and achieves measurable results for brands or organizations.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Content Creator Award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as a content creator, digital marketer, social media influencer, journalist, or in a related role primarily responsible for content creation.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in creating and publishing content across different platforms (e.g., social media, blogs, videos, podcasts), with a minimum of three years of relevant professional experience.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity and innovation in content creation, including storytelling, visual design, and multimedia production.
Impact: Evidence of the impact of their content, such as audience engagement metrics, reach, followership growth, or business outcomes (e.g., increased brand awareness, lead generation).
Consistency: Consistent production of high-quality content that aligns with audience interests and brand objectives.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in content creation, including authenticity, transparency, and respect for intellectual property rights.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Content Creator Award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of their best content creations. This should include links or samples of published articles, social media posts, videos, podcasts, or other relevant content pieces.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions as a content creator.
Metrics and Analytics: Provide metrics and analytics that demonstrate the impact and effectiveness of their content, such as engagement rates, reach, audience demographics, or other relevant data.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from clients, collaborators, or industry professionals who can attest to the nominee’s creativity, impact, and professionalism in content creation.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, testimonials, or collaborations.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Content Creator Award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in content creation, including originality, storytelling techniques, visual design, and multimedia integration.
Engagement and Reach: The ability to engage audiences effectively and achieve significant reach or visibility for their content.
Impact and Effectiveness: The measurable impact of their content on audience behavior, brand awareness, or other relevant business goals.
Consistency and Quality: Consistent production of high-quality content that maintains audience interest and aligns with brand values.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards in content creation, including transparency, authenticity, and respect for audience trust.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Content Creator Award

Overview

The Health Communications Specialist Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate excellence in effectively communicating health-related information to diverse audiences. This award celebrates individuals who excel in promoting public health, raising awareness about healthcare issues, and educating communities through strategic communication efforts.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Health Communications Specialist Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a health communications specialist, public health communicator, medical journalist, healthcare marketer, or in a related role focusing on health communication.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in health communication, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful health communication campaigns, initiatives, or projects that have positively impacted public health outcomes, raised awareness, or influenced behavior change.
Expertise: Expertise in translating complex health information into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences (e.g., patients, healthcare professionals, policymakers).
Innovation: Exhibit creativity and innovation in developing effective health communication strategies, messages, and materials.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in health communication, including accuracy, transparency, and cultural sensitivity.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Health Communications Specialist Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in health communication.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful health communication campaigns, materials, articles, or projects led by the nominee. This should include metrics demonstrating impact, audience reach, and outcomes.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, clients, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in health communication.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, testimonials, or publications.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Health Communications Specialist Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Effectiveness of Communication: The ability to effectively communicate health-related information to target audiences, including clarity, relevance, and accessibility.
Impact and Outcomes: The measurable impact of the nominee’s health communication efforts on public health awareness, behavior change, or health outcomes.
Innovation and Creativity: The creativity demonstrated in developing innovative health communication strategies, messages, and materials.
Expertise and Knowledge: Demonstrated expertise in health communication principles, including the ability to translate complex health information into understandable content.
Ethical and Cultural Sensitivity: Adherence to ethical standards in health communication practices, including accuracy, transparency, and sensitivity to cultural and demographic differences.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Health Communications Specialist Medal

Overview

The Financial PR Professional Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate excellence in managing financial communications and public relations for organizations. This award celebrates individuals who excel in navigating the complexities of financial messaging, investor relations, crisis management, and corporate communications within the financial sector.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Financial PR Professional Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently hold a position as a financial PR specialist, investor relations manager, corporate communications manager in the financial sector, or in a related role.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in financial communications and PR, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful financial PR campaigns, investor relations strategies, crisis communications, or corporate announcements that have positively impacted organizational reputation, investor confidence, or financial outcomes.
Expertise: Expertise in translating complex financial information into clear, compelling messages for stakeholders, investors, media, and the public.
Innovation: Exhibit creativity and innovation in developing effective financial PR strategies, messages, and materials that align with organizational goals and market dynamics.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in financial communications and PR, including transparency, accuracy, and regulatory compliance.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Financial PR Professional Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in financial PR and communications.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of successful financial PR campaigns, investor relations activities, crisis communications, or corporate announcements led by the nominee. This should include metrics demonstrating impact, media coverage, stakeholder feedback, or financial performance outcomes.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, clients, colleagues, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s expertise and effectiveness in financial PR and communications.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, financial reports, testimonials, or regulatory filings.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Financial PR Professional Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategic Communication: The development and execution of strategic financial PR and communications plans that enhance organizational reputation and stakeholder relations.
Impact and Results: The measurable impact of the nominee’s financial PR efforts on investor confidence, market perception, financial performance, or regulatory compliance.
Crisis Management: The ability to effectively manage and communicate during financial crises or challenging situations to mitigate risks and protect organizational reputation.
Expertise and Knowledge: Demonstrated expertise in financial communications principles, including the ability to communicate complex financial information clearly and accurately.
Ethical and Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and regulatory requirements in financial communications and PR practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Financial PR Professional Medal

Overview

The Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional creativity, innovation, and strategic thinking in the field of public relations. This award celebrates individuals who pioneer new approaches, leverage emerging technologies, and push the boundaries of traditional PR practices to achieve impactful results for clients or organizations.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as a PR practitioner, communications strategist, PR manager, or in a related role focused on public relations.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in PR and communications, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Innovation: Evidence of innovative PR campaigns, strategies, initiatives, or projects that have disrupted industry norms, introduced new methodologies, or utilized emerging technologies.
Impact: Evidence of the impact of their innovative PR efforts, such as increased brand visibility, improved reputation management, enhanced audience engagement, or measurable business outcomes.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in developing unique PR concepts, storytelling approaches, media relations strategies, or digital PR campaigns.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in PR and communications, including transparency, authenticity, and respect for stakeholders.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions as a PR practitioner.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of their most innovative PR campaigns, strategies, initiatives, or projects. This should include case studies, campaign summaries, metrics demonstrating impact, media coverage, and client or stakeholder testimonials.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from clients, colleagues, industry professionals, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s creativity, innovation, and effectiveness in PR.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, industry recognition, or publications.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Innovation: The creativity and originality demonstrated in developing and implementing innovative PR campaigns, strategies, or initiatives.
Impact and Effectiveness: The measurable impact of the nominee’s innovative PR efforts on achieving organizational goals, improving brand perception, or driving business outcomes.
Use of Technology: The effective use of emerging technologies or digital platforms to enhance PR strategies and achieve results.
Client or Stakeholder Feedback: Positive feedback, testimonials, or endorsements from clients, colleagues, or stakeholders on the impact and effectiveness of the nominee’s innovative PR initiatives.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and integrity in PR practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal

Overview

The Environmental PR Advocate Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate outstanding dedication, leadership, and impact in advocating for environmental sustainability through public relations efforts. This award celebrates individuals who excel in raising awareness, promoting environmentally responsible practices, and driving positive change in environmental policies and behaviors.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Environmental PR Advocate Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as a PR practitioner, communications strategist, environmental communications specialist, sustainability manager, or in a related role focused on environmental PR advocacy.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in environmental PR advocacy or communications, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful environmental PR campaigns, initiatives, or projects that have contributed to environmental conservation, sustainability practices, or policy advancements.
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in promoting environmental causes, engaging stakeholders, and influencing public opinion or policy decisions.
Impact: Evidence of the impact of their environmental PR efforts, such as increased public awareness, behavior change, policy adoption, or measurable environmental improvements.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in environmental PR, including transparency, accuracy, and respect for environmental science.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Environmental PR Advocate Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in environmental PR advocacy.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of their most impactful environmental PR campaigns, initiatives, or projects. This should include case studies, campaign summaries, metrics demonstrating impact, media coverage, and stakeholder testimonials.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from clients, colleagues, industry professionals, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s leadership, dedication, and effectiveness in environmental PR advocacy.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, environmental impact assessments, or publications related to environmental issues.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Environmental PR Advocate Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Effectiveness: The effectiveness of the nominee’s environmental PR efforts in raising awareness, influencing public opinion, or driving behavior change towards sustainability.
Impact: The measurable impact of their advocacy on environmental conservation, sustainability practices, policy development, or community engagement.
Innovation: The creativity and innovation demonstrated in developing and executing environmental PR campaigns, initiatives, or strategies.
Leadership and Engagement: Demonstrated leadership in mobilizing stakeholders, building coalitions, and engaging communities in environmental advocacy efforts.

Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, and accuracy in environmental PR practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Environmental PR Advocate Medal

Overview

The Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional skill, dedication, and impact in public relations within the nonprofit sector. This award celebrates individuals who excel in promoting nonprofit organizations, raising awareness about social causes, mobilizing support, and driving positive change through strategic PR efforts.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as a PR specialist, communications manager, public affairs director, or in a related role within a nonprofit organization.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in nonprofit PR and communications, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful PR campaigns, initiatives, or projects that have significantly raised awareness, mobilized support, or positively impacted the nonprofit organization’s mission and goals.
Impact: Evidence of the impact of their PR efforts on stakeholder engagement, donor support, volunteer recruitment, community relations, or advocacy outcomes.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in developing compelling PR strategies, storytelling, media relations, and content that effectively communicates the nonprofit’s mission and impact.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in nonprofit PR, including transparency, accountability, and respect for stakeholders.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in nonprofit PR and communications.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of their most impactful PR campaigns, initiatives, or projects within the nonprofit sector. This should include case studies, campaign summaries, metrics demonstrating impact, media coverage, and stakeholder testimonials.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, clients, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s effectiveness, creativity, and dedication in nonprofit PR.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, impact assessments, or publications related to nonprofit PR and communications.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategic Communication: The development and execution of strategic PR plans that effectively promote the nonprofit organization’s mission, programs, and impact.
Impact and Engagement: The measurable impact of their PR efforts on stakeholder engagement, donor support, volunteer recruitment, community relations, or advocacy outcomes.
Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in developing PR strategies, storytelling, media relations, and content that resonate with target audiences and drive engagement.
Leadership and Collaboration: Demonstrated leadership in PR campaigns, collaboration with internal teams and external partners, and effective management of PR initiatives.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, accountability, and integrity in nonprofit PR practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal

Overview

The Education Communications Expert Medal recognizes professionals who demonstrate excellence in communications within the education sector. This award celebrates individuals who excel in promoting educational institutions, initiatives, programs, and policies through strategic and impactful communications efforts.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Education Communications Expert Medal, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as a communications manager, PR specialist, public affairs director, marketing manager, or in a related role within the education sector (e.g., schools, colleges, universities, educational nonprofits).
Experience: Demonstrated experience in education communications, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successful communications campaigns, initiatives, or projects that have significantly raised awareness, enhanced reputation, or positively impacted the educational institution’s goals and mission.
Impact: Evidence of the impact of their communications efforts on stakeholder engagement, student enrollment, faculty recruitment, community relations, or educational outcomes.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in developing compelling communications strategies, messaging, media relations, and content that effectively communicates the educational institution’s strengths and impact.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in education communications, including transparency, accuracy, and respect for stakeholders.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Education Communications Expert Medal, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions in education communications.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of their most impactful communications campaigns, initiatives, or projects within the education sector. This should include case studies, campaign summaries, metrics demonstrating impact, media coverage, and stakeholder testimonials.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from supervisors, colleagues, clients, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s effectiveness, creativity, and dedication in education communications.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media coverage, impact assessments, or publications related to education communications.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Education Communications Expert Medal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Strategic Communication: The development and execution of strategic communications plans that effectively promote the educational institution’s mission, programs, and achievements.
Impact and Engagement: The measurable impact of their communications efforts on stakeholder engagement, student enrollment, faculty recruitment, community relations, or educational outcomes.
Creativity and Innovation: The creativity demonstrated in developing communications strategies, messaging, media relations, and content that resonate with target audiences and drive engagement.
Leadership and Collaboration: Demonstrated leadership in communications campaigns, collaboration with internal teams and external partners, and effective management of communications initiatives.
Ethical and Professional Standards: Adherence to ethical standards, transparency, accountability, and integrity in education communications practices.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Education Communications Expert Medal

Overview

The Best Media Event Organizer award recognizes individuals who demonstrate exceptional skill, creativity, and efficiency in organizing media events that effectively engage journalists, influencers, and stakeholders. This award celebrates professionals who excel in planning and executing successful media events that generate significant media coverage, enhance brand visibility, and achieve communication objectives.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the Best Media Event Organizer award, nominees must meet the following criteria:

Professional Role: Nominees should currently work as an event organizer, communications manager, PR specialist, or in a related role responsible for organizing media events.
Experience: Demonstrated experience in organizing media events, with a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience.
Achievements: Evidence of successfully organizing media events that have achieved significant media coverage, engaged target audiences, and aligned with organizational communication goals.
Creativity: Exhibit creativity in conceptualizing and planning media events that stand out, capture media attention, and effectively communicate key messages.
Execution: Demonstrated ability to manage logistics, coordinate media invitations, facilitate media interactions, and ensure smooth execution of media events.
Ethical Standards: Commitment to upholding ethical standards and best practices in event organization, including transparency, professionalism, and respect for media professionals.

Registration Requirements

To register for the Best Media Event Organizer award, applicants must submit the following:

Application Form: A completed application form, including personal and professional details.
Resume/CV: A detailed resume or CV outlining the nominee’s professional experience, achievements, and contributions as a media event organizer.
Portfolio: Submission of a portfolio showcasing examples of media events organized by the nominee. This should include event summaries, media coverage reports, attendee lists, photos, and any relevant metrics demonstrating success.
Recommendation Letters: At least two letters of recommendation from clients, colleagues, media representatives, or stakeholders who can attest to the nominee’s skills, creativity, and effectiveness in organizing media events.
Supporting Documents: Any additional supporting documents that highlight the nominee’s accomplishments, such as awards, media testimonials, event evaluations, or participant feedback.

Evaluation Criteria

Nominees for the Best Media Event Organizer award will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

Event Concept and Planning: The creativity and effectiveness of the event concept, planning process, and overall strategy.
Media Engagement and Coverage: The ability to attract media interest, secure attendance, and generate significant media coverage before, during, and after the event.
Impact and Results: The measurable impact of the media event on achieving communication objectives, enhancing brand visibility, and conveying key messages to target audiences.
Logistical Management: Effective management of event logistics, including venue selection, scheduling, media invitations, participant coordination, and on-site execution.
Feedback and Satisfaction: Positive feedback and satisfaction from media participants, stakeholders, and attendees regarding the organization and execution of the media event.

The selection committee will review all submissions and evaluate them based on these criteria to identify the most deserving recipient of the Best Media Event Organizer award

Awards

Prium Awards For Individuals / Teams

Journalist of the Year

Journalist of the Year

Best News Anchor

Best News Anchor

Best Correspondent

Best Correspondent

Best Journalist

Best Journalist

Best Photojournalist

Best Photojournalist

Best Radio Broadcaster

Best Radio Broadcaster

Best News Editor

Best News Editor

Best Columnist

Best Columnist

Best Feature Writer

Best Feature Writer

Best Online Journalist

Best Online Journalist

Best Blogger

Best Blogger

Best News Producer

Best News Producer

Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award

Best Sponsorship and Partnerships Institutional Employee Award

PR Professional of the Year

PR Professional of the Year

Best Crisis Communicator

Best Crisis Communicator

Best Media Relations Specialist

Best Media Relations Specialist

Best Social Media Manager

Best Social Media Manager

Digital PR Specialist

Best Digital PR Specialist

Best Employee Communications Leader

Best Employee Communications Leader

Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate

Best Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate

Brand Manager

Brand Manager

Best Product Launch Specialist

Best Product Launch Specialist

Best Event Planner

Best Event Planner

Best Content Creator

Best Content Creator

Health Communications Specialist Medal

Health Communications Specialist Medal

Financial PR Professional Medal

Financial PR Professional Medal

Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal

Most Innovative PR Practitioner Medal

Environmental PR Advocate Medal

Environmental PR Advocate Medal

Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal

Nonprofit PR Specialist Medal

Education Communications Expert Medal

Education Communications Expert Medal

Best Media Event Organizer

Best Media Event Organizer

Best Sponsorship Manager

Best Sponsorship Manager

Internal Communications Leader Medal

Internal Communications Leader Medal

Best Investor Relations Professional

Best Investor Relations Professional

Best Broadcast Media Expert

Best Broadcast Media Expert

Best B2B Communications Specialist

Best B2B Communications Specialist

Best Integrated Communications Professional

Best Integrated Communications Professional

Best Travel and Tourism PR Specialist

Best Travel and Tourism PR Specialist

Best Technology Communications Professional

Best Technology Communications Professional